There's no definitive answer to which AI inference platform delivers the highest performance benchmarks, because "performance" depends on the model, the hardware, the optimization stack, and your specific workload.
But the question itself reveals a real need: enterprises want a rigorous way to compare platforms before committing budget. GMI Cloud, as a provider of both GPU infrastructure (H100/H200 clusters) and a 100+ model inference engine, has a unique vantage point on this question.
This article uses that perspective to explain what inference platforms do, identify the evaluation dimensions that matter most, compare six mainstream platforms (BentoML, Vertex AI, SageMaker, Bedrock, Baseten, Modal) against GMI Cloud's capabilities, break down BentoML's specific strengths and how they pair with GMI Cloud infrastructure, and offer a step-by-step selection guide grounded in real workload requirements rather than synthetic benchmarks.
What Inference Platforms Do and Why You Need One
The Core Role of an Inference Platform
An inference platform is the operational layer that serves your AI models to production users. It handles model loading, request routing, dynamic batching, GPU memory management, auto-scaling, and health monitoring. Raw model performance is only part of the equation.
How efficiently the platform orchestrates these operations under real traffic conditions determines the throughput, latency, and cost you actually see in production.
Why Third-Party LLM APIs Break Down at Scale
Hosted APIs from providers like OpenAI and Anthropic work great for prototyping. But at enterprise scale (50K+ daily requests), three problems surface. You can't tune batching, quantization, or caching, which means you're paying for unoptimized inference.
Shared endpoints deliver variable latency with no P99 SLA guarantees. And per-token pricing ($10-75/M output for premium models) scales linearly, while dedicated GPU inference lets you amortize fixed costs across higher utilization.
What a Dedicated Inference Platform Gives You
With a dedicated platform, you control the full optimization stack: precision mode (FP16, FP8, INT8), serving engine (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, Triton), batch size, KV-cache strategy, and scaling policy. That's where real performance gains come from.
Teams running optimized configurations on H100 GPUs with TensorRT-LLM typically see 2-4x throughput improvements versus default serving setups.
What to Look for When Evaluating Platforms
Core Principle: Long-Term Agility Over Short-Term Benchmarks
Don't choose a platform because it won a single benchmark. Choose the one that gives you the most room to optimize over time. Models change quarterly. New GPU hardware ships every 12-18 months.
The platform that lets you swap engines, adjust precision, and scale without replatforming will deliver the best cumulative performance.
Key Evaluation Dimensions
Deployment flexibility: can you serve any model (open-source, proprietary, fine-tuned) on the GPU type you need? Performance optimization controls: can you choose FP8 vs. FP16, enable continuous batching, or switch serving engines? Security and compliance: does it support network isolation, data residency, and SOC 2?
Scalability without lock-in: can you scale from 1 to 100 GPUs without rewriting configs, and leave the platform without rewriting code? OpenAI-compatible APIs and standard containers reduce this risk.
Six Platforms vs. GMI Cloud: A Side-by-Side Comparison
GMI Cloud
- Deployment Flexibility: 100+ model API + custom Deploy on dedicated H100/H200
- Performance Optimization: Pre-configured TensorRT-LLM, vLLM, Triton; FP8; user-tunable
- Lock-in Risk: Low (OpenAI-compatible)
- Best For: GPU infra + model API + optimization from one vendor
BentoML
- Deployment Flexibility: Any model, any cloud; open-source framework
- Performance Optimization: Full control: engine, batching, quantization
- Lock-in Risk: Low (open-source)
- Best For: Max control with platform engineering capacity
Google Vertex AI
- Deployment Flexibility: Gemini + select open-source; managed endpoints
- Performance Optimization: Google-managed; limited user tuning
- Lock-in Risk: High (GCP-locked)
- Best For: Deep GCP organizations
AWS SageMaker
- Deployment Flexibility: Broad GPU options; custom containers
- Performance Optimization: SageMaker Neo; configurable instances
- Lock-in Risk: High (AWS-locked)
- Best For: Existing SageMaker training pipelines
AWS Bedrock
- Deployment Flexibility: Curated catalog (Claude, Llama, Titan); serverless
- Performance Optimization: AWS-managed; no GPU-level tuning
- Lock-in Risk: High (AWS-locked)
- Best For: Quick foundation model access on AWS
Baseten
- Deployment Flexibility: Any model via Truss; GPU-optimized
- Performance Optimization: Truss-based; configurable GPU allocation
- Lock-in Risk: Medium (proprietary Truss)
- Best For: Custom model deploy with minimal ops
Modal
- Deployment Flexibility: Python-first serverless; decorator-based
- Performance Optimization: Auto GPU provisioning; limited engine control
- Lock-in Risk: Medium (proprietary runtime)
- Best For: Dev-focused async/batch GPU tasks
The Gap Most Platforms Leave Open
Here's what this comparison makes visible: most platforms solve one half of the problem. BentoML gives you maximum software control but no GPUs. Bedrock gives you models but no hardware-level tuning. Vertex AI and SageMaker give you managed infrastructure but lock you into one cloud.
GMI Cloud is the only option that owns both the GPU hardware (H100/H200 SXM, 8 GPUs/node, NVLink 4.0 at 900 GB/s bidirectional aggregate per GPU on HGX/DGX platforms, 3.2 Tbps InfiniBand) and a 100+ model library. Performance optimization happens at every layer, from silicon to API.
GMI Cloud: Where GPU Infrastructure Meets Model Inference
Product Positioning
GMI Cloud (gmicloud.ai) is an AI model inference platform, branded "Inference Engine," built on its own H100/H200 SXM GPU clusters. The company controls hardware provisioning, network topology, and serving-engine configuration end to end.
It serves 100+ models across LLM, Video, Image, Audio, and 3D via a unified API, while also offering dedicated Deploy endpoints for custom or fine-tuned models.
Core Capabilities
GPU-elastic serving: deploy on H100 (~$2.10/GPU-hour) or H200 (~$2.50/GPU-hour) with auto-scaling. Reserved capacity for stable baselines, on-demand for peaks. Check gmicloud.ai/pricing for current rates.
Inference co-optimization: the stack comes pre-tuned with CUDA 12.x, TensorRT-LLM, vLLM, Triton, NVLink 4.0, and InfiniBand. Run FP8 inference, enable continuous batching, and adjust KV-cache strategies without managing infrastructure.
Multi-platform API: all models share an OpenAI-compatible interface. GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) at $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output, GPT-5 at $1.25/$10.00, Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $3.00/$15.00, DeepSeek-V3.2 at $0.28/$0.40. Swap models without changing code. Pricing from the GMI Cloud Model Library (console.gmicloud.ai).
Cost Advantage
GLM-5 output at $3.20/M is 68% cheaper than GPT-5 ($10.00/M) and 79% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/M). GLM-4.7-Flash at $0.07/M input and $0.40/M output is 33% cheaper than GPT-4o-mini ($0.60/M). Because GMI Cloud owns the GPU infrastructure, it passes hardware efficiencies directly to API pricing.
Selection Guide: From Requirements to Platform
Step 1: Define Your Non-Negotiables
List the three things you can't compromise on: multi-model access? GPU-level tuning? No vendor lock-in? SOC 2? Eliminate any platform that fails on even one.
Step 2: Match Workload to Platform
Your Requirement (Start Here)
- GPU infra + model API + tuning, one vendor — Start Here: GMI Cloud
- Open-source max control, bring your own GPU — Start Here: BentoML (pair with GMI Cloud GPUs)
- All-in GCP, managed experience — Start Here: Vertex AI
- Deep AWS, custom model serving — Start Here: SageMaker
- Quick foundation model API on AWS — Start Here: Bedrock
- Custom deploy, minimal ops — Start Here: Baseten
- Dev-focused batch/async GPU — Start Here: Modal
GMI Cloud's Selection Edge
If your top priorities include both performance tuning and multi-model access, GMI Cloud collapses two vendor relationships into one. You get H100/H200 compute, a pre-optimized serving stack, and 100+ models (45+ LLMs, 50+ video, 25+ image, 15+ audio) under one API and one billing account.
BentoML: A Deeper Look from GMI Cloud's Perspective
Why BentoML Stands Out
BentoML is the strongest open-source option for teams that want granular serving control. It supports any model framework (PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX), any serving engine (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, Triton), and deploys on any cloud.
Built-in features include adaptive batching, model composition pipelines, canary deployments, auto-scaling, and OpenAI-compatible API generation.
Real-World Application
A fintech company running fraud detection needed sub-100ms inference on a custom 13B parameter model while handling 200K peak-hour requests. BentoML's adaptive batching let them tune batch sizes dynamically, cutting P99 latency by 35% compared to their previous SageMaker setup.
The key advantage: BentoML exposes low-level serving parameters that managed platforms abstract away.
BentoML + GMI Cloud: The Synergy
BentoML's limitation is that it doesn't provide GPUs. You need hardware. That's where GMI Cloud fits. Deploy BentoML on GMI Cloud's H100/H200 clusters and you get open-source serving flexibility on enterprise-grade GPU infrastructure with NVLink 4.0 and InfiniBand networking.
For workloads that don't need custom serving logic, GMI Cloud's built-in Deploy endpoints run alongside BentoML services on the same infrastructure, same billing. It's the best of both worlds: open-source control when you need it, managed convenience when you don't.
Ready to benchmark on enterprise GPU infrastructure?
Book a consultation with GMI Cloud's team at gmicloud.ai to get a customized inference platform evaluation: GPU sizing for your models, pricing projections across GLM-5, GPT-5, and Claude, BentoML integration planning, and a phased deployment roadmap tailored to your workload.
FAQ
Q: Does any platform consistently win on performance benchmarks?
No. Results depend on model size, precision, batch size, sequence length, and hardware. A platform that leads on Llama 70B FP8 throughput may trail on GPT-5 API latency. Benchmark your specific workload on 2-3 finalists to get meaningful data.
Q: How much cheaper is GLM-5 compared to GPT-5?
GLM-5 output costs $3.20/M tokens versus GPT-5 at $10.00/M, a 68% reduction. GLM-4.7-Flash at $0.40/M output is 33% cheaper than GPT-4o-mini at $0.60/M. Both available on GMI Cloud. Check console.gmicloud.ai for current pricing.
Q: Can I run BentoML on GMI Cloud GPUs?
Yes. GMI Cloud's H100/H200 instances come pre-configured with CUDA 12.x, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, and Triton. Deploy BentoML containers on GMI Cloud infrastructure for open-source serving control on enterprise-grade hardware.
Q: What's the fastest way to start evaluating?
Sign up at console.gmicloud.ai and use Playground to test 100+ models interactively. For custom models or BentoML workloads, contact GMI Cloud for a guided GPU sizing and deployment evaluation.
What Criteria Should Be Used to Select an AI


