Finding the right inference provider for large-scale production isn't about picking the platform with the best benchmark score. It's about matching GPU resource capacity, deployment flexibility, and operational reliability to your specific workload profile.
GMI Cloud, a provider of both GPU infrastructure (H100/H200 clusters) and a 100+ model inference engine, is a strong contender for enterprises that need production-grade GPU support and model API access from a single vendor.
This article explains what production-grade inference platforms do and why third-party APIs fall short at scale, establishes five evaluation criteria anchored in GPU resource capability, compares six mainstream platforms (BentoML, Vertex AI, SageMaker, Bedrock, Baseten, Modal) with their GPU support limitations, provides a detailed look at GMI Cloud's product capabilities, and offers a step-by-step selection guide for matching platforms to large-scale production requirements.
What Production-Grade Inference Platforms Do
Core Function
A production inference platform handles everything between your trained model and your end users: model loading, request routing, GPU memory management, dynamic batching, auto-scaling, health monitoring, and version management.
It's the operational layer that turns a model file into a reliable, scalable API endpoint.
Why Third-Party APIs Fall Short at Scale
Hosted model APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) work for prototyping and low-volume use. But at large-scale production (100K+ daily requests), three limitations emerge. First, you can't control GPU-level optimization: batching, precision, and caching are managed by the provider, not you.
Second, shared endpoints deliver variable latency with no P99 SLA guarantees under your specific load patterns. Third, per-token costs scale linearly: GPT-5 at $10.00/M output tokens costs $300/day at 1M daily output tokens, with no volume discount path.
What a Production-Grade Platform Provides
Dedicated GPU infrastructure with controllable serving engines, auto-scaling that responds to your traffic patterns, monitoring that tracks your latency percentiles and GPU utilization, and deployment patterns (canary, blue-green) that let you update models without downtime.
The GPU resource layer is the foundation: without reliable, high-performance GPU availability, none of the software optimizations above can deliver their full value.
Five Evaluation Criteria for Production Inference
1. Deployment Speed
How fast can you go from model to serving endpoint? Platforms with pre-configured GPU instances and serving stacks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, Triton) cut deployment from weeks to hours.
If the platform requires you to configure CUDA drivers, install serving engines, and tune NCCL settings manually, that's engineering time subtracted from product development.
2. Flexibility and Control
Can you choose your serving engine, adjust batch sizes, select precision modes (FP8, FP16), and deploy custom models alongside pre-built ones? Platforms that abstract away these controls limit your ability to optimize for your specific workload.
GPU resource control is central here: can you select GPU types, configure multi-GPU setups, and manage GPU memory allocation?
3. Performance Optimization
Does the platform support continuous batching, PagedAttention, FP8 inference, and KV-cache optimization? These techniques can deliver 2-4x throughput improvements on the same GPU hardware. But they require GPUs with high memory bandwidth (H100 at 3.35 TB/s, H200 at 4.8 TB/s) to realize their full potential.
A platform running on older GPU generations won't benefit as much.
4. Security and Compliance
Enterprise workloads need network isolation, data residency controls, and audit trails. Shared API endpoints can't provide model-level isolation. Dedicated GPU instances with private networking address these requirements, but only if the platform's GPU provisioning supports dedicated tenancy.
5. Lock-in-Free Scalability
Can you scale from 1 GPU to 100 without rewriting deployment configs? And can you leave the platform without rewriting serving code? OpenAI-compatible APIs and standard container formats minimize migration risk.
GPU resource lock-in is the most expensive kind: if your serving code, monitoring, and scaling policies are tied to one provider's proprietary GPU management layer, migration becomes a multi-month project.
Six Platforms Compared: Features and GPU Limitations
Platform (Strengths / GPU Support Limitation / Best For)
- BentoML — Strengths: Open-source, full engine control, cloud-agnostic — GPU Support Limitation: No GPU infrastructure; you bring your own hardware — Best For: Teams with ML infra engineers and existing GPU access
- Google Vertex AI — Strengths: Gemini access, TPU support, managed pipelines — GPU Support Limitation: GCP-locked; GPU selection limited to GCP instance catalog — Best For: Organizations already deep in GCP
- AWS SageMaker — Strengths: Full ML lifecycle, broad GPU options (P5, Inf2) — GPU Support Limitation: AWS-locked; proprietary container formats limit portability — Best For: Teams with SageMaker training pipelines on AWS
- AWS Bedrock — Strengths: Serverless, quick model API access — GPU Support Limitation: No GPU-level control; shared infrastructure; no custom model deploy — Best For: Quick foundation model access without infra management
- Baseten — Strengths: Truss framework, configurable GPU allocation — GPU Support Limitation: Proprietary Truss layer; GPU fleet smaller than hyperscalers — Best For: Custom model deployment with minimal ops
- Modal — Strengths: Python-first serverless, fast iteration — GPU Support Limitation: Limited serving-engine control; GPU types constrained; cold starts — Best For: Developer-focused batch/async workloads
The common pattern: platforms either give you GPU control but no infrastructure (BentoML), or give you managed infrastructure but lock you into one cloud (Vertex AI, SageMaker), or give you ease-of-use but limited GPU-level optimization (Bedrock, Modal).
None of these six combine owned GPU infrastructure with a comprehensive model library and production-grade serving tools in a single platform.
GMI Cloud: GPU-Backed Production Inference
Core Capabilities
GMI Cloud (gmicloud.ai) is an AI model inference platform, branded "Inference Engine," built on its own NVIDIA H100 SXM (~$2.10/GPU-hour) and H200 SXM (~$2.50/GPU-hour) clusters.
It combines GPU infrastructure with a 100+ model library spanning LLM, Video, Image, Audio, and 3D categories through a unified OpenAI-compatible API. The serving stack (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, Triton) comes pre-configured and tuned for each GPU type. Check gmicloud.ai/pricing for current rates.
Production Inference Features
High-concurrency GPU scheduling: auto-scaling adjusts GPU allocation based on real-time request volume. Reserved instances provide cost-predictable baselines; on-demand instances handle burst traffic.
8 GPUs per node with NVLink 4.0 (900 GB/s bidirectional aggregate per GPU on HGX/DGX platforms) and 3.2 Tbps InfiniBand inter-node support large-model tensor parallelism and high-throughput serving.
Elastic resource scaling: scale from a single GPU to multi-node clusters without rewriting deployment configs. Deploy mode runs dedicated endpoints with auto-scaling, Batch mode handles async large-volume processing, and Playground provides interactive testing before production commitment.
Why GMI Cloud for Large-Scale Production
GPU availability and reliability: owned infrastructure means no contention with other tenants for GPU capacity during peak demand.
Workload adaptability: the same platform serves 45+ LLMs (GLM-5 by Zhipu AI at $1.00/M input, $3.20/M output, 68% cheaper than GPT-5), 50+ video models, 25+ image models, and 15+ audio models.
Cost efficiency: GLM-4.7-Flash at $0.07/M input and $0.40/M output is 33% cheaper than GPT-4o-mini ($0.60/M) for high-volume workloads. All pricing from the GMI Cloud Model Library (console.gmicloud.ai).
Selection Guide: Matching Platform to Production Requirements
Step 1: Define Your Production Requirements
What models are you running (7B, 70B, 400B+)? What's your daily request volume? What P99 latency does your application require? Do you need multi-model serving (LLM + vision + TTS)? Do enterprise customers require dedicated infrastructure and compliance controls?
Step 2: Evaluate Against the Five Criteria
Requirement (Recommended Platform)
- Owned GPU infra + model API + optimization control — Recommended Platform: GMI Cloud
- Open-source max control, have your own GPUs — Recommended Platform: BentoML (pair with GMI Cloud GPUs)
- Deep GCP investment, need TPU option — Recommended Platform: Vertex AI
- Existing AWS pipelines, need ML lifecycle — Recommended Platform: SageMaker
- Quick API access, no infra management — Recommended Platform: Bedrock
- Custom model deploy, lightweight ops — Recommended Platform: Baseten
- Dev-focused async GPU tasks — Recommended Platform: Modal
Step 3: Prioritize GPU Resource Support
For large-scale production workloads, GPU resource capability should be a top-tier evaluation factor, not an afterthought. Ask: does the platform own or rent its GPUs? What GPU types are available (H100, H200, or older generations)? Can you configure multi-GPU and multi-node deployments?
Is the serving stack pre-optimized for the hardware? GMI Cloud answers yes to all four, which is why it's the recommended starting point for teams whose production workloads depend on reliable, high-performance GPU infrastructure.
Ready to build production-grade inference on enterprise GPU infrastructure?
Book a consultation with GMI Cloud at gmicloud.ai to get a customized deployment plan: GPU sizing for your models, pricing projections across GLM-5, GPT-5, and Claude, auto-scaling configuration, and a phased rollout roadmap tailored to your production workload requirements.
FAQ
Q: Why does GPU ownership matter for production inference?
Owned GPU infrastructure means no contention with other tenants during peak demand, consistent hardware performance, and direct control over network topology (NVLink, InfiniBand). Rented GPUs from hyperscalers can face availability constraints and variable performance.
GMI Cloud owns its H100/H200 clusters, providing dedicated capacity for production workloads.
Q: How does GMI Cloud's pricing compare for high-volume workloads?
GLM-5 output at $3.20/M tokens is 68% cheaper than GPT-5 ($10.00/M) and 79% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/M). At 10M daily output tokens, that's $32/day on GLM-5 versus $100/day on GPT-5. GPU instances run at ~$2.10/GPU-hour (H100) and ~$2.50/GPU-hour (H200). Check console.gmicloud.ai for current pricing.
Q: Can I run BentoML on GMI Cloud's infrastructure?
Yes. GMI Cloud's H100/H200 instances come pre-configured with CUDA 12.x, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, and Triton. You can deploy BentoML containers on GMI Cloud GPUs for open-source serving control on enterprise-grade hardware with NVLink and InfiniBand networking.
Q: What if my production workload spans multiple model types?
GMI Cloud's Model Library covers 45+ LLMs, 50+ video models, 25+ image models, and 15+ audio models, all accessible through a single API on the same GPU infrastructure. You can serve an LLM chatbot, a video generation pipeline, and a TTS engine from one platform without managing multiple vendor relationships.
Which AI Inference Provider Delivers
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
