Algorithmic bias refers to systematic and repeatable errors in AI outputs that result in unfair treatment of certain individuals or groups. This bias can originate from skewed training data, biased human labeling, model assumptions, or how outcomes are applied in the real world.
Bias can manifest in various ways such as gender, race, age, or socioeconomic disparities and often reflects existing societal inequalities. Importantly, algorithmic bias isn’t always intentional; it can emerge even in seemingly objective systems due to incomplete or unrepresentative data.
Preventing and mitigating algorithmic bias is critical in high-stakes applications like hiring, healthcare, finance, and law enforcement, and requires deliberate design, monitoring, and auditing practices.
It’s when an AI system produces systematic, repeatable errors that treat certain people or groups unfairly, often because of skewed data, biased labels, model assumptions, or how results are used in the real world.
Common sources include unrepresentative training data, biased human labeling, assumptions baked into the model, and deployment context any of which can tilt outcomes against specific groups.
Bias can appear along lines like gender, race, age, or socioeconomic status. Even “objective” systems can mirror existing societal inequalities if their data or setup isn’t balanced.
No. It often emerges unintentionally for example, from incomplete data or labels yet still leads to unfair treatment.
In high-stakes uses like hiring, healthcare, finance, or law enforcement biased results can harm people directly, so fairness and reliability are critical.
The article highlights deliberate design, ongoing monitoring, and auditing as essential practices to prevent and mitigate unfair outcomes.